As businesses such as Bunnings adopt facial recognition technology to enhance security, the debate between protecting employees and safeguarding customer privacy intensifies. Retailers are increasingly using this technology to identify and remove banned individuals—such as recidivist thieves or those who pose a threat due to occupational violence and aggression (OVA). However, this practice raises critical concerns around data security, privacy, and operational effectiveness.
Facial recognition systems are designed to quickly identify individuals flagged in a database. For example, if a banned individual enters a store, the system can alert staff in seconds, enabling them to take action. This proactive approach is intended to protect staff and customers, as a means to ensure safety.
However, questions arise regarding data collection and retention:
Companies must adhere to strict data retention standards. Signs may indicate the use of CCTV, but more transparency is needed around facial recognition. Clear communication about data use, storage, and deletion policies is crucial to maintaining trust. However, even with good policies and systems in place, we know data breaches occur especially with the evolving threat of foreign interference and espionage. There have already been wide scale data breaches on facial recognition programs, raising concerns about how the data may be used by bad actors, including fraud and other identity related crimes especially when integrated with AI.
Another significant issue is the potential for bias, particularly with certain ethnicities or individuals wearing items like hoodies. Misidentification could lead to unjust interactions, raising concerns about discrimination and reputational harm. If a system incorrectly flags an individual, the resulting interaction could escalate to an aggressive confrontation and also expose the organisation to legal risk.
While the technology can identify banned individuals, the practical response is less clear. For instance, someone who has been banned previously but entering peacefully to shop may become agitated if confronted. In this instance do police respond due to a banning notice? In many cases, the police are too under-resourced to intervene unless a serious crime is committed. Or do staff intervene? If security staff or loss prevention officers confront individuals, could that actually create a situation and make it worse? Further, is the implementation and intended use of this technology in contradiction to other organisational policies, specifically in the Occupational Health & Safety category? This raises the question of whether these systems are creating more harm than good by initiating aggressive interactions rather than preventing them and actually exposing organisation to more legal OH&S risk.
While facial recognition offers potential benefits for deterring crime and protecting staff, its implementation and use must first be carefully considered.
Should an organisation choose to implement the technology it must be carefully managed – including ensuring transparency around data collection and retention policies; training staff on de-escalation techniques to avoid unnecessary confrontations; and addressing biases within the technology to prevent discrimination.
Businesses must strike a balance between leveraging technology to protect their people and respecting the privacy and rights of customers. The conversation around facial recognition is far from over, and ongoing dialogue, regulation, and ethical considerations will be essential as this technology evolves.
Facial recognition in retail presents both opportunities and risks. As we navigate this emerging landscape, the focus should remain on ensuring that its application is meaningful, ethical, and centered on safety—without compromising individual privacy or creating unintended harm.
We offer clients new to Vanguard Risk a complimentary 1-hour consultation.
It's a chance for you to ask any questions and for us to learn more about your business.
These consultations are strictly confidential and hold no-obligation.
Please submit this form and we'll contact you to schedule an appointment.
As the holiday season approaches, retail environments become bustling hubs of activity. However, the festive rush also brings increased risks such as occupational violence, aggression, and theft. Drawing from nearly 25 years of experience in security management and law enforcement, Founder and Managing Director, Tim Wood, offers essential strategies to enhance safety and security across retail settings during the holiday season.
Shopping centres have long been integral to Australian life, serving as bustling hubs for shopping, dining, and socialising. However, recent violent incidents and the increasing abuse directed at workers have made 2024 another critical year for reassessing safety, security, and risk management strategies—particularly in crowded places like shopping centres.
Last week, the Federal Government passed legislation to introduce a groundbreaking social media ban for those under 16, aiming to protect young users. While the intention is clear—mitigating risks to youth—it’s a complex issue that demands careful analysis.
